Peer review weighted by trust, not by vote count.
REX scores every review by the reviewer's Reputation × Expertise — giving funding programs fairer, gaming-resistant decisions. Tailored to your program.
Who it's for
Built for the programs deciding where funding goes.
REX is for grant programs, DAOs and foundations that run proposal reviews and need decisions they can defend. We bring a ready tool with proven advantages, tuned to your program — you bring the proposals and reviewers, REX brings the trust layer.
Proven on real review data
Sharper decisions, less wasted review effort.
How REX works
From raw reviews to a calibrated verdict.
Temperature check
Reviewers screen proposals fast — promising vs. low-quality — and skip weak ones early, so effort goes where it matters.
Expert-matched assignment
Proposals route to reviewers by interest and expertise, with conflict detection and workload balancing built in.
Trust-weighted scoring
Each detailed review is weighted by its REX score (Reputation × Expertise) across a six-category rubric — not counted equally.
Bayesian classification
Reviews aggregate into HIGH / GREY / LOW with a confidence level — a calibrated verdict, not a single misleading average.
A look inside
This is what a review round looks like.
The REX score
Reputation × Expertise — gaming-resistant by design.
Reputation is earned from peer ratings, flag precision and whether a reviewer catches consensus low-quality proposals. Expertise comes from domain match and self-rated confidence. REX combines them, rewards honest self-flagging, and quantifies uncertainty instead of hiding it in an average.
See REX on your program.
Tell us about your funding program and we'll set up a demo tailored to your rounds, rubric and reviewer base.